From USC & the Keck Graduate Institute
While technology doesn't always make the heart flutter or go all a Twitter, there's no denying its advances and potential.
- In Exposition Park, for example, one group of engineers envisions a day soon when flexible and transparent carbon films could be part of new kinds of solar cells, devices that would employ expanses of lab-created, graphene-polymer materials woven in ordinary-looking curtains or even T-shirts to convert sunlight into power. The new materials aren't as efficient yet as standard silicon solar cells in creating electricity. But because they're cheaper to make and so much more flexible, they could be mass-produced and worked into common products such that, experts say, those curtains could light the living room or that T-shirt might power a smart phone or MP3 player.
Could those curtains light the living room or that T-shirt power a cell phone?
- Of course, at the same time, some other Trojan experts have taken note of both the ubiquity and limits of social media and our so-called Web 2.0 lives. They've tracked for a decade the American public's burgeoning use of the internet, where more than two thirds of us have bought stuff, where most of us hook in via broadband and where most of our homes have at least two or more computers tied in. While we've become huge users and consumers of net services, however, we Americans expect lots of what occurs online to be free; while half of us said in a survey that we have tried the micro-blogging and messaging service Twitter, no respondents said they would pay for it if there were a charge. While online users may be inundated with blinking, winking and prominently placed ads, half of those responding to researchers' surveys said they never click on net ads and 70% deemed them annoying.
Will Americans pay for Twitter or click on internet ads? No way, net survey finds
- If some folks in Southern California say they're on the brink of shrinking powerful microscopes into cell-phone-sized electronic applications, why can't sprawling mechanisms that provide crucial diagnoses about the global scourge of drug-resistant tuberculosis be downsized, too? Researchers in Claremont have won a $3.6 million National Institutes of Health grant to work on key processes that could lead to a compact, hand-held device that costs less than $100 and could be used in far-flung parts of the planet where an important step in caring for impoverished sick people is determining if they suffer from strains of TB resistant to commonly used drugs. While these challenges prove huge in Africa, Haiti and other parts of the poor and developing world, concern about drug-resistant TB also grows in the industrialized world where the disease, for example, has been detected in Los Angeles and has caused scares such as a 2007 incident in which an infected individual criss-crossed continents on jet flights.
Can experts shrink, cut costs of devices to detect drug-resitant TB?
